On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 06:38:28PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote: > > I *much* prefer the feel of the K100 to the K-x. It has several important > features that are missing in the K-x, and even a few that are still missing > in the K-r. In good light, i.e. ISO 200, I think that the sensor actually > gives better photos than the K-x or K20.
The K100 uses the old (Sony) sensor, doesn't it? (not the Samsung sensor of the K20). I'm not totally surprised to find that there are some circumstances when it does better than the K20; there were times when I thought the K10 was at least as good as the K20 (most notably when there was a lot of red in the shot, such as would be found when photographing roses, or Ferraris, etc.). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
