On Oct 5, 2011, at 2:51 AM, steve harley wrote: > on 2011-10-04 23:18 Boris Liberman wrote >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Larry Colen<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> 2. Double cam lens barrel sucks. Totally does not inspire any confidence. >>> >>> I'm not sure what you were talking about. >> >> It already has a minimal wobble of the secondary barrel (the one >> farther from the lens mount) and I think it is not going to be any >> better in time... As it is now, it does not have any effect on the >> pictures because it is really very minute, but single cam barrel of my >> Sigma 24-60 is simply better. > > and i was just thinking the 16-50 would be so much nicer than my 16-45/4.0, > whose pronounced wobble has been on my mind as i've been using that lens > again lately
It IS so much nicer than the 16-45. If my 16-50 has any wobble whatsoever, I've never noticed it. All I know is that it's a great performer. On the other hand, the wobble of the 16-45 was distressing. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
