On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:45 AM, John Coyle wrote: > The link is to a small gallery (4 shots) taken in Bologna, last year. The > first image is > good enough as a shot of a bunch of university students on a big (graduation) > day for > them, but on processing the image I thought there might be three images > contained in it > that could stand-alone. > Was I right? > > http://www.members.iinet.net.au/[email protected]/Inclusions/index.html > > > John Coyle > Brisbane, Australia >
I agree that you have three subordinate images buried in the larger. The full scene is good enough, but really too busy; there are at least three different areas of interest! (:-)> Of the three narrower scenes, the third is ok. But of course the context is lost. In some ideal world, a place I seldom have a chance to spend much time in, you would be able to discard all four images - the full scene and its piece-parts. Then you would move to the next frame on the film roll and delightedly examine a slightly different image. This other image would show the full scene, but the camera view would be shifted to the right a few notches. The trio standing in discussion would be the focal point, and all of the actors in motion around them would be contrasting minor players in the scene. stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
