Stan, Adroit critique. You missed the flash player :-( Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Stan Halpin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:45 AM, John Coyle wrote: > >> The link is to a small gallery (4 shots) taken in Bologna, last year. The >> first image is >> good enough as a shot of a bunch of university students on a big >> (graduation) day for >> them, but on processing the image I thought there might be three images >> contained in it >> that could stand-alone. >> Was I right? >> >> http://www.members.iinet.net.au/[email protected]/Inclusions/index.html >> >> >> John Coyle >> Brisbane, Australia >> > > I agree that you have three subordinate images buried in the larger. The full > scene is good enough, but really too busy; there are at least three different > areas of interest! (:-)> > Of the three narrower scenes, the third is ok. But of course the context is > lost. > > In some ideal world, a place I seldom have a chance to spend much time in, > you would be able to discard all four images - the full scene and its > piece-parts. Then you would move to the next frame on the film roll and > delightedly examine a slightly different image. This other image would show > the full scene, but the camera view would be shifted to the right a few > notches. The trio standing in discussion would be the focal point, and all of > the actors in motion around them would be contrasting minor players in the > scene. > > stan > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
