on 2012-08-28 15:43 DagT wrote
Which is very unfair for those who have great ideas.

that's a sweeping statement to which i will withhold my response, but your individual points below are thought provoking …


You know the circuitry for making efficient car engines? It may easily be 
duplicated by software if it is not already. Some millions of dollars research 
just to give it away to the competitor. Why bother making clean engines? But we 
want them, so have make people do the research if they don´t get anything back?

it seems to me that this example is about an alternative implementation of an idea rather than a method; patents aren't intended to protect ideas


Another thing is, of course, that we in Norway have found lots of new oil 
resources the past few months. Mostly due to software developed by seismic 
companies where the sensors themselves are well known. Why would they make 
these investments of the next (mostly likely US) company could just use the 
same idea. Our economy is certainly dependent on partially software relates, 
very complex, inventions.

if i were deciding how such a company should protect its work, i would treat it as a trade secret, not as a patent


No, your theory works for small software inventions, but those are not the 
complete picture. You need a better definition.

i think your point is not disputing my definition, but rather returning to the question of whether some or all software should be patentable


Another thing is, of course, that computer programs may be implemented as 
hardware...

if you mean as firmware, or as a configuration of an integrated circuit, it's still software if it is a description (loosely speaking) of inputs, outputs and a logical sequence; and if you are talking about specific computer programs, they are covered by copyright (copyright laws, at least in the US, are also flawed, but i don't object in principle to software copyrights)



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to