Hi,

I also have the old Sigma 17-70 (actually I think that I have some 
responsibility in Boris owning one...) and I second Boris comments. The only 
complaint is that is is a bit heavy and the zoom eventually becomes loose.
I have physically seen the latest version and I have to admit that it looks and 
feels extremely compact.

However, my favorite compromise range / IQ would be the 18-135. Sigma has one 
but its reputation is worst than the 17-70s and the Pentax one seems a bit 
expensive.

Regards,
Jaume




----- Mensaje original -----
> De: Boris Liberman <[email protected]>
> Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> CC: 
> Enviado: Martes 23 de julio de 2013 13:47
> Asunto: Re: the 16-45 to 17-70 range
> 
> Dave, I've (the oldest version of) Sigma 17-70/2.8-4.5. Such lenses
> can be had for order of USD 250-300. I cannot praise mine enough. It
> successfully replaced DA* 16-50/2.8. Later versions are 17-70/2.8-4.0
> (notice faster long end of the zoom range) and further introduced HSM
> (Sigma's ultrasonic AF) and OS (Optical image Stabilization). I opted
> out of these as I wanted something as simple as possible so that it
> won't break down just because.
> 
> Optically I've no complaints at all. It just what suits me best right
> now if and when I have to shoot with DSLR.
> 
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:40 PM, David J Brooks <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>  Hey all.
>> 
>>  This last week at the plow demo got me thinking again about my short
>>  zoom, the 16-45. Normally i take two cameras, the D2H with re 70-200
>>  VR f2.8 and the D200 with the 18-70. I use the 18-70 for the closer
>>  shots when the teams come at me. This year i took the K-5 and used the
>>  16-45. It performed fine, but at 45 at the long end just does not get
>>  what i want before i switch back to the longer zoom.
>> 
>>  So
>> 
>> 
>>  Im thinking something along the lines of the Pentax or Sigma 17-70 ish
>>  lenses, and i think i saw onĀ  Henrys site an 18-135???
>> 
>>  I know these have come up before just looking for opinions.
>> 
>>  Also the 55-30 is still on my list, although the sales person at
>>  Henreys showed me the Sigma version, a bit cheaper and now i'm humming
>>  on that one.
>> 
>>  Comments about the short zooms or the Sigma 55-300 appreciated,
>> 
>>  Dave
>> 
>>  --
>>  Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
>>  www.caughtinmotion.com
>>  http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
>>  York Region, Ontario, Canada
>> 
>>  --
>>  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>  [email protected]
>>  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Boris
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to