LOL...so true.....

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Stan Halpin
<s...@stans-photography.info> wrote:
> Boris said: "...indeed eventually the zoom becomes creepy"
>
> Boris, I have found this to be a general phenomenon; as things age, they 
> start to appear creepy to others. You'll find out soon enough!
>
> stan
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2013, at 2:21 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>
>> I concur. Although when I first saw the lens in your hands, Jaume, I
>> did not expect to own it some day. I should point that it is not that
>> heavy given the speed and zoom range. It is rather well made although
>> indeed eventually the zoom becomes creepy. It does have the zoom look
>> that is handy for transportation, obviously.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Jaume Lahuerta <jlah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I also have the old Sigma 17-70 (actually I think that I have some 
>>> responsibility in Boris owning one...) and I second Boris comments. The 
>>> only complaint is that is is a bit heavy and the zoom eventually becomes 
>>> loose.
>>> I have physically seen the latest version and I have to admit that it looks 
>>> and feels extremely compact.
>>>
>>> However, my favorite compromise range / IQ would be the 18-135. Sigma has 
>>> one but its reputation is worst than the 17-70s and the Pentax one seems a 
>>> bit expensive.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jaume
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Mensaje original -----
>>>> De: Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com>
>>>> Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>>>> CC:
>>>> Enviado: Martes 23 de julio de 2013 13:47
>>>> Asunto: Re: the 16-45 to 17-70 range
>>>>
>>>> Dave, I've (the oldest version of) Sigma 17-70/2.8-4.5. Such lenses
>>>> can be had for order of USD 250-300. I cannot praise mine enough. It
>>>> successfully replaced DA* 16-50/2.8. Later versions are 17-70/2.8-4.0
>>>> (notice faster long end of the zoom range) and further introduced HSM
>>>> (Sigma's ultrasonic AF) and OS (Optical image Stabilization). I opted
>>>> out of these as I wanted something as simple as possible so that it
>>>> won't break down just because.
>>>>
>>>> Optically I've no complaints at all. It just what suits me best right
>>>> now if and when I have to shoot with DSLR.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:40 PM, David J Brooks <pentko...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hey all.
>>>>>
>>>>> This last week at the plow demo got me thinking again about my short
>>>>> zoom, the 16-45. Normally i take two cameras, the D2H with re 70-200
>>>>> VR f2.8 and the D200 with the 18-70. I use the 18-70 for the closer
>>>>> shots when the teams come at me. This year i took the K-5 and used the
>>>>> 16-45. It performed fine, but at 45 at the long end just does not get
>>>>> what i want before i switch back to the longer zoom.
>>>>>
>>>>> So
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Im thinking something along the lines of the Pentax or Sigma 17-70 ish
>>>>> lenses, and i think i saw on  Henrys site an 18-135???
>>>>>
>>>>> I know these have come up before just looking for opinions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also the 55-30 is still on my list, although the sales person at
>>>>> Henreys showed me the Sigma version, a bit cheaper and now i'm humming
>>>>> on that one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments about the short zooms or the Sigma 55-300 appreciated,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
>>>>> www.caughtinmotion.com
>>>>> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
>>>>> York Region, Ontario, Canada
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Boris
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>> follow
>>>> the directions.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boris
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to