You mean a 12-105 f/2.8? =) On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:19 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/29/2013 2:03 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote: >> >> Wed Aug 28 23:48:20 EDT 2013 >> Boris Liberman wrote: >> >>> On 8/28/2013 10:52 PM, Zos Xavius wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://photorumors.com/2013/08/28/updated-pentax-k-mount-lens-roadmap-published/ >>>> >>>> Huzzah! >>>> >>> >>> That's an interesting development. It would seem that Pentax don't plan >>> to introduce any *new* (I don't count DA limited with different coatings >>> as new, sorry) prime lenses. I wonder if any of these zoom lenses will >>> be faster than constant 2.8. >> >> >> >> Wed Aug 28 17:12:14 EDT 2013 >> Larry Colen wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:04:25PM -0400, Stan Halpin wrote: >>>> >>>> Interesting zoom range(s). But all shown as DA so far, not DA*. >>>> And FINALLY an AF teleconverter. Again, DA rather than DA*. But after >>>> waiting 15+ years, I guess I'll take what I can get. >>> >>> >>> 18-85? >>> >>> If that's f/2.8 (or faster) that will go pretty much right to the >>> top of my shopping list. Particularly if it's a DA* or at least WR. >>> >> >> Boris and Larry: >> You are hoping for a faster-than-f/2.8 zoom. >> I haven't seen such in K-mount, and I am not aware of any in other >> mounts (but that might be my ignorance). >> >> So, why do you think Pentax would produce such a fast zoom? >> I don't think so. I even doubt it'd be 2.8, as otherwise it would've >> been a DA* or a limited. >> >> Igor >> > > A zoom that stayed 2.8 through-out a useful range would be nice. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
