On 1/5/2014 6:05 PM, John wrote:
On 1/4/2014 5:16 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 4, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Boris Liberman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Attila, you have to realize that this Sigma has nothing on the
market to compare it to. DA* 16-50 is a different lens. It has WR,
it is wider and longer as far as zoom range goes, while Sigma
boasts tremendous image quality and the USB dock so that you could
play with your copy to your heart liking.
I'm not buying Sigma and I'm not re-buying DA* 16-50. But I very
much would like Pentax to do something rather unlimited and produce
a lens that will compete with Sigma in IQ dept face to face.
Have you compared teh Sigma and the 16-50? The latter, when properly
assembled, has very good image quality.
Paul
It does make me wonder why you felt the need to add that qualifier?
The same could be said of the Sigma.
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy,
crazier.
- H.L.Mencken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
