Speaking of FA 20-35. Sometimes it isn't wide enough. But I don't find that a big issue. I just shoot a two vertical shots pano stitching it afterwords. -- MaritimTim
My private photo blog: http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To err is human to arr is pirate ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2014-06-13 19:31 GMT+02:00 Tim Øsleby <[email protected]>: > I see you compare the size of the 20-40 with the 31 Bill. That's a > zoom compared to a prime. I see it more as a compact zoom. Take a look > at the top picture here comparing it to the kit lens. > http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/hd-pentax-da-20-40mm-limited/construction-and-handling.html > It is larger than the standard kit lens, but one has hood mounted, the > other don't. (I rarely uses a lens without the hood mounted). > > I also see from the illustrations that the natural focal length is 31 > mm (that's where it is most compact). That's very cool, a 31mm normal > lens with zoom capabilities. > > BTW. I've already got the FA 20-35. I already love that lens. Except > for the build quality, and lack of weather sealing. So I don't think I > will feel very limited by the Ltd. > > All that said. I might end up buying both :-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
