Also the 20-35mm is a constant aperture, which makes strobest style
photography a bit easier.
On 6/13/2014 1:36 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Speaking of FA 20-35. Sometimes it isn't wide enough. But I don't find
that a big issue. I just shoot a two vertical shots pano stitching it
afterwords.
--
MaritimTim
My private photo blog: http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To err is human
to arr is pirate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014-06-13 19:31 GMT+02:00 Tim Øsleby <maritim...@gmail.com>:
I see you compare the size of the 20-40 with the 31 Bill. That's a
zoom compared to a prime. I see it more as a compact zoom. Take a look
at the top picture here comparing it to the kit lens.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/hd-pentax-da-20-40mm-limited/construction-and-handling.html
It is larger than the standard kit lens, but one has hood mounted, the
other don't. (I rarely uses a lens without the hood mounted).
I also see from the illustrations that the natural focal length is 31
mm (that's where it is most compact). That's very cool, a 31mm normal
lens with zoom capabilities.
BTW. I've already got the FA 20-35. I already love that lens. Except
for the build quality, and lack of weather sealing. So I don't think I
will feel very limited by the Ltd.
All that said. I might end up buying both :-)
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy,
crazier.
- H.L.Mencken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
