Mark - boy it HAS been a while since you sold on ebay!
we get 12 free photos,and all mine are 2000 across. They want larger
files these days because they are pushing smart phone sales..
Here is a current listing of mine of a cute mug and bowl.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/201152066011?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
Note you can mouse over image and get a really close look..
and another - (Starbucks cards are my salvation)
http://www.ebay.com/itm/201132945342?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
I never get fancy with frames and such with the text...
But what is devilling me is some rhinestone brooches - getting detail
there is a bitch.. had some success with the macro tonight - may list
one soon.
ann
On 8/17/2014 18:09, Mark C wrote:
I'd second what tan said about going with f8 (or even f5.6).
For web sized photos on ebay - maybe you could have a couple of overall
photos and then just separate images showing the particular details up
close. Been a while since I sold anyting on eBay though so I don't know
if they charge extra for each picture or not.
Mark
On 8/17/2014 5:49 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 8/17/2014 17:32, Mark C wrote:
Hi Ann -
For what you are doing, I think that the ideal would be to put the
camera on a set of focus rails, focus in on the front edge and then just
move the rails a little closer, shoot again, repeat till you get to the
end. If you don't have the focus rails just turn the focus ring. Given
that everything is stationary you can just turn the ring, shoot,
repeat...
Dont have the rails - but doing what you described..
I've just done a few test runs... with a couple of comical results,
I dyslexically turned the ring in the wrong direction..away from the
subject - duh...
I'm using a 50mm macro on F22 at ISO 800. I did find, though, that
a couple of the frames actually were fine for my purposes without
the need for stacking - I should say a couple of the subjects were
such that it really wouldn't be necessary to bother with the stacking.
For stacking software.... Photoshop can do it - not sure which version
it first showed up in (maybe CS4?) It is done by using bridge to load
the separate images into layers then just running the edit->align layers
command followed by the edit->blend layers command.
I only have elements 5.0
CombineZP is a stacking program that is freeware. Here is a video
about it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2B36OStuHjs
As you can see - the interface is somewhat dated but the software works
well.
Well if the interface is dated, given I hvae elements 5 - that may be
just the thing lol - haven't looked at the vid yet..
thanks for all the info!
ann
I have tried both turning the foucs ring while firing away and also
pushing the camera in on the subject. For me turning the focus ring has
worked best - BUT I am shooting live subjects in the fiel with the
camera on a a monopod. The faster I can capture a bunch of shots the
less likely the subject is to move. By nature, pushing in the camera on
a monopod basically means moving it in an arc, which complicates the
aligning of the images. So for me, in the field, it is K-3 on the
fastest shooting mode (whcih is very fast) and a quick turn of the focus
ring.
Good luck!
Mark
On 8/17/2014 2:41 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
what I want to use the technique for is photographing items I'm
selling on ebay that are tiny. so I'm not looking to BLUR the
background so much as getting every tiny detail of an object nice and
sharp.
Could this work if I focused on the front, say, set continuing/rapid
firing on, and turn the focusing ring of my 50 macro very slowly
(with camera on tripod of course) to get several frames to stack and
then
run them through the stacking software?
Is there stacking software that is free or inexpensive and work
with or outside of photoshop elements 5.0?
stan, I think the one you are using is pricey,yes?
ann
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
