There are no cons. If the Pentax DNGs are not output with lossless compression, running them through DNG Converter can apply lossless compression and save on disk space. That's really the only pro.
Unless disk space were at a premium, I would not bother. G > On Feb 10, 2015, at 6:58 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've been shooting DNG as my raw file with the K-3. Got to thinking the > last day or two ... > > What are the pros/cons of running the Pentax DNG through the Adobe DNG > converter? > > If you think it's a good idea, why is it a good idea? Conversely, if you > think it is not a good idea, why? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
