Godfrey,

I appreciate the technical insights you provide every so often on the issues discussed.

Sorry, I couldn't help but parody your previous response here.
My parody was not in contradiction, but just in projecting the customer's perspective. And it wasn't a reflection on you, but rather on the
recent trend in the consumer services' industry in general, and
Adobe in particular.


1. Your response reminded me of the response I've heard recently
*N* too many times from some corporate customer services. They admit that their system (product, etc.) is not working properly, but then say they wouldn't not be able to do the things right, giving me details of their idiosyncratic system (e.g. they are unable to communicate with another department of theirs, or "their computer doesn't allow them doing" what's right). I usually tell them that my pen's design prevents it from writing that company's name on a check, and that I hope they'd agree it is a good reason for not paying for their services.


2. In addition, I am rather tired of Adobe's own and fun-boy-advocates
such as Scott Kelby arrogantly ASSuming that LR users must be upgrading their computers every 2 years.

3. Finally, - during the week that followed the release of LR-6.0, I spoke with the customer support of Adobe, and they assured me that the stand-alone version of the installation (suitable for a free trial) will be made available again soon, after they'd fix some errors in it. And that has never happened.

Again, sorry, Godfrey, the main aim of my response was Adobe.

Igor


 Godfrey DiGiorgi Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:41:34 -0700 wrote:

... And if I am not needing both PS and LR, the cost analysis clearly shows
that a standalone LR is much cheaper than CC.


No need to be snarky: I didn't say otherwise. I haven't used PS much in recent years either, which is why I have a perpetual license for LR and continue to use an old version of PS.

G

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to