I agree Paul.
I remember a John Shaw seminar where he was asked 'What's the best way to
sell images"?
He responded by advising the audience to become writers and use their images
in the article/books.
What I've seen over the years, especially since the wide spread use of
digital capture, is that there are so many really good/great images out
there that good marketing will set the difference between what sells and
what doesn't.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "paul stenquist" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pentax spotted
Oh, so the problem is that Lik makes money. Good for him. I love seeing
photographers achieve financial success by producing something people
want. What a novel idea! I admire Rockwell’s ability to make a buck, but I
consider him a buffoon. Lik also knows how to make money, but he does it
with intelligence, so I respect him. I’ve never been jealous of those who
earn more than I do. More power to them.
Paul
On Jun 25, 2015, at 7:56 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
A ridiculous comparison. Like his vision or not, Lik obviously has a
great deal of technical expertise. Rockwell has none.
However, they both do a tremendous job of uniting those of us who don't
make enough off our photography each year to pay for the hard drive
storage we use.
Paul via phone
On Jun 25, 2015, at 6:11 PM, Larry Colen<[email protected]> wrote:
John wrote:
He does appear to have used the low noise/low light capabilities of
the
645D (or 645Z) to good effect in this series.
It's a good example of what Ken Rockwell might be able to do if he
actually used some of the equipment he reviews.
I was just about to phrase it as:
Mr. Lik has done as much for photography both culturally and
artistically as Mr. Rockwell.
But, yeah.
--
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
