Urgh... you're asking me to _remember_ something?

It's a very long time ago but I think I used one of the "artistic" filters in PS
to pick up the edges of an image, turned that into a negative as it made the
edges light against a black background before reversal, and then printed that
onto the film.  This gave a predominantly blue background with a white image.
 It was only for a class on photochemistry, so the quality of the image wasn't
important to anyone but me.  Quite a bit of experimentation was needed with
exposure.  There was almost no consistency between images made with the same
negative, due to the handmade nature of the substrate.

> On 06 March 2016 at 18:07 Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
> 
> Mike,
> I'd love to have some links on how to do digital negatives for
> cyanotypes on LASER printers. Didn't know that was possible. I've got
> access to good laser printers at work (including a copier that can do
> 11x17) and I've got a Liquid Cyanotype kit from Photographer's
> Formulary sitting here itching to do some watercolor paper cyanotypes
> of a particular digital image that I have. I've got a pack of
> transparency material also.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 11:49 AM, mike wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 06 March 2016 at 17:40 Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I tend to agree with you Mike.
> >> With the prices at places like sharpprints.com I find it hard to
> >> justify the expense of an inkjet. In many cases you are going to have
> >> to gamble on $100 or more for a set of ink just to see what you've
> >> got. I'm in that position right now with an old Epson R800. It was
> >> given to me and I assume there will be heads clogged (which is why I'm
> >> researching). I'm mostly interested in using it to print on overhead
> >> transparency material to make digital negatives for contact
> >> printing/alternative processing. I think I remember seeing a process
> >> that will allow you to use only three black/grey inks (that you can
> >> put in any three working positions on your printer (forget the clogged
> >> ones)... so may try that approach if I can't get all of them
> >> unplugged.
> >
> > That sounds interesting.  I've used laser printed ones to make negs for
> > cyanotypes.  Keeping us informed of progress would be appreciated, at least
> > by
> > me.
> >
> >>
> >> If I can learn the transparency digital negative technique, I might
> >> think about a wide format printer for the same purpose, down the road.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 11:30 AM, mike wilson <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> On 06 March 2016 at 01:08 Darren Addy <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> This is a side discussion to Ann's purchase of a lightly used R2400. I
> >> >> agreed with Mike Wilson's caution, but not necessarily his view of
> >> >> "Irrecoverably". Using Epson's print head cleaning utility is
> >> >> guaranteed to use up a lot of ink, if not actually unclog the print
> >> >> head.
> >> >>
> >> >> I like (much better) this guy's tutorial:
> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1hxljJhi9M
> >> >> His use of aquarium pump tubing as a reservoir/sight glass is ingenious.
> >> >> Also worthwhile is his formula for DIY Inkjet print head cleaner:
> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHUQAZFdTOM
> >> >>
> >> >> With these techniques in your pocket you may find a real bargain out
> >> >> there, even if the printer doesn't work perfectly when you purchase
> >> >> it.
> >> >
> >> > I can only go by my own experience.  Two very expensive printers (and a
> >> > cheaper
> >> > one) failed due to head clogging that Epson's procedures would not clear.
> >> >  Having access to a large variety of chemicals, I used internet knowledge
> >> > to
> >> > try
> >> > a number of different options.  No success.  Finally, for the last
> >> > machine,
> >> > I
> >> > found a recently damaged one that had a good head.  Over a week, I
> >> > swapped
> >> > the
> >> > head only to find that Epson has the neat little trick of killing the
> >> > printer if
> >> > you access the head.  This can only be fixed by some firmware kludge that
> >> > only
> >> > Epson engineers know.  I couldn't find it on the internet.  So I then had
> >> > the
> >> > choice of paying about 2/3rds of the new cost for Epson to replace the
> >> > head
> >> > (no
> >> > nearby agent, of course) or walking away.  It was one of the best walks
> >> > of
> >> > my
> >> > life.
> >> >
> >> > In my ever so humble opinion, inkjet printers are the spawn of the devil
> >> > and
> >> > the
> >> > fact that they print anything at all is nothing short of a miracle.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> >> > follow the directions.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> “The Earth is Art, The Photographer is only a Witness ”
> >> ― Yann Arthus-Bertrand, Earth from Above
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> >> follow
> >> the directions.
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> > follow the directions.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> “The Earth is Art, The Photographer is only a Witness ”
> ― Yann Arthus-Bertrand, Earth from Above
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to