The 55-300 would have, also, been a great companion and with more reach on both ends. I've, also, heard the cry that one cannot have too many lenses.
J Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 2, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Subash Jeyan <[email protected]> wrote: > > i've just got myself an F 70-210 f4-5.6, though it'd actually be two > weeks before i get my hands on it. the reviews of the lens on the PF > were pretty good and i was curious about the images taken with the > lens. so i went to PPG to have a look. most of the images for that lens > in PPG seems to have been taken by Ken Waller. indeed, the first 15 > images or so were his. superb stuff. recognised a few other names from > the list too. > > i am glad i bought this lens though it doesn't necessary follow that > the images i make will be half as good. i was planning to take the DA > 55-300 on my trek in the himalayas next month but wondering if i should > take this lens instead (coupled with the sigma 17-50/2.8). > > here is the PPG link for this lens if anyone else is interested: > > https://pentaxphotogallery.com/photos/gallery/query?camera=&lens=930 > > > subash > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
