thanks Alan. because i expect to do some birding too, i think i'll take
the 55-300. but i look forward to the lens nevertheless.

On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 20:05:20 +0200
Alan C <> wrote:

> Subash, I still have one from film days & I must say it's pretty
> good. However, I prefer my HD 55-300  (greater range & even better)
> so my poor F 70-210 hardly sees the light of day.
> Alan C.
> On 02-Oct-18 04:42 PM, Subash Jeyan wrote:
> > i've just got myself an F 70-210 f4-5.6, though it'd actually be two
> > weeks before i get my hands on it. the reviews of the lens on the PF
> > were pretty good and i was curious about the images taken with the
> > lens. so i went to PPG to have a look. most of the images for that
> > lens in PPG seems to have been taken by Ken Waller. indeed, the
> > first 15 images or so were his. superb stuff. recognised a few
> > other names from the list too.
> >
> > i am glad i bought this lens though it doesn't necessary follow that
> > the images i make will be half as good. i was planning to take the
> > DA 55-300 on my trek in the himalayas next month but wondering if i
> > should take this lens instead (coupled with the sigma 17-50/2.8).
> >
> > here is the PPG link for this lens if anyone else is interested:
> >
> >

PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to