Thanks again. After your reply yesterday I retried the colour negs but this 
time used the WB dropper on what I knew to be white - the whitest part of the 
window frame in neg #28. I then inverted the curves, and this is pretty much 
what came out, which is not bad at all for current purposes - top row:

https://lightroom.adobe.com/shares/4b4aeebf424b4d5aaeeadd495b883953/albums/de5820d8befe4c0a928b9af08a18ae93/assets/e00c74794c6b491f928695c2991280d1/metadata

I’ll try using the film rebate too. When it’s not obvious from the negatives 
where the best white it becomes a bit haphazard. I have ordered a roll of Ektar 
100 and will shoot a series of bracketed shots, with notes, of my white balance 
card and, when I find it, my Q-60 target. If I include these negs with a set 
then I will always know where there is a standard white, even though it will be 
different film stock, and hopefully it will be close enough for my purposes, 
which is to get a good enough positive for me to evaluate.

When the time comes to scan individual negatives for high quality output I will 
try and learn how to do this properly. It may be that I can never do it - 
certainly not by eye as I’m colourblnd - in which case the neg will have to go 
to a lab.

> On 20 Apr 2020, at 16:53, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Glad to help out! 
> 
> Removal of the crossover mask is probably the most vexing part of working 
> with color negative processing because it varies by the type of film, the 
> particular way a film was processed, and the age of the film as well. I 
> remember from working in the photofinishing lab … it was no better then, a 
> skilled print machine operator simply looked at the film and knew how much to 
> tweak the reference settings based on the experience of having down a few 
> thousand frames. 
> 
> In this album on flickr - https://www.flickr.com/gp/gdgphoto/QJ437u - I show 
> a simplistic capture setup with a random B&W negative and then another 
> capture of a random color negative. I used the White Balance dropper on the 
> film rebate between frames to neutralize the crossover mask and then tweaked 
> it further in the finish rendered image. This particular film had a 
> relatively light crossover mask; other films have much deeper hue'ed 
> crossover masks. 
> 
> I don't know that a reference gray/color target is going to give much better 
> information than just using the rebate of the film unless it was made at the 
> same time as the original images on that same film. It's always just a rough 
> starting point for my image processing. There's as much feel and art to this 
> as there is science IMO, because we all tend to perceive color slightly 
> differently and what is too cool for one person is often just right for 
> another. Unless you're working with specific colormetric type materials and 
> needs… forensic and science data, for instance. 
> 
> For that example photo, I found that the crossover mask removal was 
> reasonable and technically about right, but that the resultant image felt a 
> little dull and cool, so I then warmed it up with a shift in the color 
> temperature and hue controls, poked at the contrast a touch. 
> 
> G
> 
>> On Apr 19, 2020, at 12:18 PM, Bob Pdml <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Godfrey, that’s very helpful and I’ll experiment with your methods. 
>> I’ve already discovered dragging the tone curves; the orange mask is a bit 
>> problematic at the moment.
>> 
>> It occurs to me that if I were to shoot a slide each of a colour target and 
>> a grey card under daylight (my lightbox is 5000K), and include them on each 
>> colour index print, it might help in some way. Or I might just be 
>> overcomplicating something that only needs to be good enough, not perfect.
>> [… snip …]
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to