I think the 'problem' here is that while the MZ-S is 'significantly' *underpriced*, the Z1P was MASSIVELY **underpriced** due to the fact Pentax had to drop the price in order to sell any Z1's. This arguably now makes the MZ-S 'seem' expensive in comparison. To my mind the people who see it as expensive overlook the fact that build quality costs and tend to be 'features people'.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 20 August 2002 16:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Next Pentax Flagship Camera? > > > "Robert Woerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >My problem with the MZ-S is that it is way overpriced. > > After having used an MZ-S for over a year, I believe it is > significantly > *underpriced* for the construction quality and capabilities it offers. > > -- > Mark Roberts > www.robertstech.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To > unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the > directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery > at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
