Lennon Day-Reynolds wrote:
On 10/18/06, Thomas Lockney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have to go the hard route, XSLT can be both a godsend and a
> curse.
No thanks, don't need more problems than I already have. ;~)
Not that it hasn't been massively oversold, but XSLT actually isn't a
bad tool within its original problem domain: basic transformation of
predictable XML content.
My usual reaction to XSLT was the same as yours, Thomas, but this is
pretty close to the core use case for the technology, ain't it?
And if all the diverse apps you're configuring do emit valid xhtml,
apache has an XSLT transform module mod_transform
<http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/apache/mod_transform/>.
Though piping everything through a hpricot based ruby filter seems like
more fun to me.
--
Devin Ben-Hur 503/860-4114 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts."
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.5/483 - Release Date: 10/18/2006
_______________________________________________
PDXRuby mailing list
[email protected]
IRC: #pdx.rb on irc.freenode.net
http://lists.pdxruby.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxruby
