David wrote
I'm not a codey. I don't do macros etc. never
>needed them. If I *really* have to learn a scripted language then I will,

David
Im with you also, if I wanted to be codey  I would have purchased Cadence or 
Mentor,  i.e.   codey nightmares ( that is just to install the products)  .  I 
think the anti codey's have made our point and hope we convinced Altium on the 
next service pack to correct some serious marketing errors with global editing. 
 

I will say this about DXP....I have never seen more boards hosed up until one 
of my customers started using DXP.  Loading a netist and/or  synchronizing is 
overwhelming and confusing, the electrical rules are  confusing,  and the 
online DRCs don't work well.   I agree with some one else's comments,  the 
electrical rules become experiments in programming.  Two of us screwed around 
for 30 minutes trying combinations rules for soldermask until we "think" we got 
it right.     Online unrouted connections is not functional anymore so you have 
to keep running the DRCs over and over again just see where you are. The online 
DRC has such a long delay sometimes you don't know if you violated a clearance 
when manually routing until you have completed the route.  After you finish the 
route, the error lights up.  What is that about?   But it will show pretty 
corporate logos when generate a BOM.  (this was a joke,  if you all remember   
I really wanted to listen to Brittany Spears while I generated a BOM)  This is 
serious folks.    It was a huge mistake for Altium to take away online  
connection checking.  I gave up trying to customize reference designators for 
assembly dwgs because the globals don't work for ref designators,  The fastest 
solution is to export back to 99SE.  I understand that was fixed in SP2, but I 
am in business for myself and my fingers must continue to fly on the keyboard 
or I loose $$$.  

ALTIUM  please, please, please before you release the next service pack, 
someone test it.  I would volunteer my services to Beta testing , but I don't 
make money Beta testing someone's software.  I get request all of the time to 
test software.  There are a ton of menu's and lists that aren't even in 
alphabetical order, which make me believe Altium is sourcing code to foreigners 
since they don't know A-Z  is a sequence.  Please test it with a real pcb 
before you release it. Open up a service bureau and offer free pcb design if 
you must.

If the Auto router still doesn't work, take it off the product.  It is rather 
useless at this point. The first thing I do is disable all autorouting ability 
so that I cant accidently hit autoroute.  This causes  hours of work to 
instantly transform into crap.   Add  an interrupt key to every function so 
that I never have to use  CNTL ALT DEL  to halt what ever trip the program 
decided to take.        Plenty of software packages were sold without routers. 
PADS, PCAD and even Mentor.   Include a decent router like ELECTRA or SPECCTRA 
if you want play with the big boys.


2005 is coming up  DXP should be a fairly mature product by now.  Give us back 
phone support   I was actually angry when I was told that I didn't have phone 
support.  Especially when the Freaking problem was your licensing bug that 
locked me out from  using  "your" software.  That's right  the software isn't 
mine according to the  Eula.   The next time Altium receives a PO from me it 
will spell out the legal terms as enforced in the state of Maryland that the 
property is Mine not Altium's. 




Mike Reagan  C.I.D.
EDSI  

 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to