Dennis

On 0603 here, plucked randomly from a production board, Pad size
(standard pb) is 1 x 1 mm with pads 1.7mm apart. Component pitch 1.6mm
(gives gap of 0.6 mm aprox). Our Pb free size is different although this
still works its not optimal.

These run through our process here of paste (using MPM3030 printers) and
Philips (Assembleon/Yamaha) placement machines and Soltec oven just
fine, including double sided reflow.

The same boards are also made elsewhere using a mixture of Dek printer /
Universal chip shooters/Panasonic placement/Soltec reflow ovens.

What you will get away with regarding component pitch and densities will
depend also on the reflow process as your paste definitions are closely
linked to the reflow capabilities of the CEM. If you go pb free you will
have a lot less reduction on pad size so the printer tolerances (or
slowed down for repatability) so will need to be looked at, as you want
to retain good gasketing to the pad even at high speed using very wet
pastes so it does not weep in between the SM pads  you could end up with
some paste deposit in the trench which will solder ball who knows
where....

I would expect some comments from your CEM with a 40 mil (1mm approx)
pitch as this only leaves a gap of 0.2 mm between pads of 0.8 x 0.8 mm
which will end up with no solder mask between them, since most 0603
(1608) parts have width of 0.8 mm +/- 0.15mm or so, if the max parts
tolerances for physical size are seen in reality (0.15mm) on 2 parts
side by side then this exceeds the available space between parts so they
will touch. So placement accuracy does not even come into it as the
physical dimensions of the parts leave no tolerance at all.  0603
resistor sizes and tolerances based on Rohm MCR03/Samsung RC1608, Cap
sizes from Murata GRM18/Samsung CL10 series. 

Hope you find some of this useful, hopefully I did not make an error
jumping between mils/mm :-)

John 

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 20 February 2005 18:43
> To: Protel EDA Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] how close 0603
> 
> 
> how close do y'all pack 0603's side by side ?
> 
> Dennis Saputelli
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Integrated Controls, Inc.           Tel: 415-647-0480  EXT 107
> 2851 21st Street                    Fax: 415-647-3003
> San Francisco, CA 94110             www.integratedcontrolsinc.com
> 
> 
> 
>  
> ____________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
> 
> To Post messages:
> mailto:[email protected]
> 
> Unsubscribe and Other Options:
> http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
> 
> Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>  
> Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> 


____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to