Dear John N, Let me expose my ignorance. What is "suprasubjectivity?
With all the best. Sung __________________________________________________ Sungchul Ji, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy Rutgers University Piscataway, N.J. 08855 732-445-4701 www.conformon.net > But do note that what all relations have in common is suprasubjectivity > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Awbrey [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 9:55 > To: Edwina Taborsky > Cc: Gary Fuhrman; [email protected]; Peirce List > Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Natural Propositions > > Re: Edwina Taborsky > At: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13840 > > Edwina, > > Setting terminology aside for just a moment, there is at present a general > lack of understanding as to what constitutes (1) a relation, (2) a triadic > relation, (3) a triadic sign relation. Those subjects are treated by > Peirce in his logic of relative terms and the corresponding mathematics of > relations, all of which is clear enough in his early papers. Without a > grasp of that background, most of what he writes later is doomed to be > mis-interpreted. > > Jon > > Edwina Taborsky wrote: >> Gary F - thanks for this introduction. >> >> I think it's important to clarify that, first, the interactions between >> the sign and the object; and the sign and the interpretant, are >> relations - my use of this term has prompted serious criticism on the >> Peirce list! I continue to use the Peircean term of 'representamen' for >> this mediate sign...rather than sign. I confine the term 'sign' to the >> full triad of object-representamen-interpretant. >> >> And I think it's important to acknowledge that there are nine such >> relations available to semiosis - not just the three of icon, index and >> symbol - which refer anyway, only to the relation of the representamen >> to the object and ignore the other two vital semiosic processes of the >> representamen-in-itself and the relation to the interpretant. >> >> Edwina > -- > > academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey > my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ > inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ > isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA > oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey > facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
