because it does not add anything to saying "the crater is caused by the meteor" F
Den 07/09/2014 kl. 21.45 skrev "Deely, John N." <jnde...@stthom.edu<mailto:jnde...@stthom.edu>>: How is “the crater is an index of the meteor” superfluous for understanding the crater? From: Frederik Stjernfelt [mailto:stj...@hum.ku.dk<http://hum.ku.dk/>] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2014 8:47 To: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee<mailto:biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee>; Peirce List Subject: [biosemiotics:6685] Re: Natural Propositions: Dear Stan - Good luck! I am a fallibilist - if you make some convicing findings, I might change my views - Best F
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
