Jon,

If we adopt your methodology, I guess that in order to decode this message
of yours, we need to look into the history of usage of the terms
"probability", "statistics", "technical" and "distinction", as well as
"term" and "look into"; and we have to make all of that history explicit
before we dare to guess what you're talking about.

I think we have a better chance of understanding Peirce's particular usages
of the terms "event" and "occurrence" by looking at the contexts in which he
used them, including his purpose of contrasting them with the term "fact".
We may guess wrong about what he means, at first - abductions are often
wrong - but just as often, by continuing the dialogue, we can *learn* that
they are wrong, and guess again.

gary f.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Awbrey [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 10-Oct-14 9:10 AM
To: 'Peirce List'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.8

Gary & All,

Just off-hand, you might look into the way the term "event" is used in
probability and statistics, and the technical distinction that is made
between "event" and "occurrence".  I'm pretty sure the terms have been used
that way since Boole, at least, if not since the time of Fermat and Pascal.

Regards,

Jon

Gary Fuhrman wrote:
> Gary R, Clark, Stephen, lists,
> 
> Clark, I can't comment on Davidson because I haven't read him. But as 
> for Peirce's usage of "event", it never occurred to me that it means 
> anything different than the usual vernacular meaning: an event is 
> something that actually happens.

-- 

academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ inquiry list:
http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to