Peircers,
There are a number of interesting possibilities and problems that arise with the interpretation of Peirce's implication
and non-implication symbols but I'd like to hold off on discussing those until we get a base camp established. My main
focus here will be the duality between extensional and intensional descriptions of relations and what that suggests for
the information-theoretic integration of those aspects.
Regards,
Jon
On 2/1/2015 6:36 PM, Jon Awbrey wrote:
Peircers,
Here is the first selection from Peirce's chapter on relatives in the 1880
Algebra of Logic.
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/01/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-1/
Regards,
Jon
--
academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
