Further up the road.
 
"Provision of An Opponent Indefinite Correlate of an Individual Dual Relative 
with Coexistents !"
 
 
"Lover-of-a woman of Paris, Madrid, London, NewYork....etc."
 
(The intensional rephrasing "loved-by-x" doesn't seem to change the 
fundamentals)
 
Jim W
 
> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:30:49 -0500
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Peirce’s 1880 “Algebra Of Logic” Chapter 3 • Selection 2
> 
> Jim, List,
> 
> Yes, 0 and \infty are symbols for falsehood and truth, whose extensions 
> are the empty set and the universe, respectively.  It is only for 
> infinite sums and products that we need a theory of limits.
> 
> In the language of lattices and partial orders, individuals and simples 
> would be called atoms and co-atoms, respectively, if I recall correctly.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jon
> 
> On 2/4/2015 3:33 PM, Jim Willgoose wrote:
> > Thanks Jon. I made  a diagram to picture an (1) arbitrary x < A
> > returning  o and (2) an arbitrary x >/ a /returning 00.
> > (fn. 16 refers to P's Boole article 1870 and calls this latter "1.") I
> > realize you have much more complex numbers and calculations in mind.
> >   But the idea of an arbitrary  next smaller or greater x allows one to
> > define a manageable boundary.  Peirce calls these "ideals." But for
> > instance, given a time, space, or proof length constraint, thus a finite
> > condition, I must specify what an  actual individual and a simple will be.
> >
> > Jim W
> >
> > 1.)    0     <--x....(  (A1) )
> >
> > 2.)    ((A1) (A2) (A3) (A4) (A5))....../a/ --> 00
> >
> >  > Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 08:48:22 -0500
> >  > From: [email protected]
> >  > To: [email protected]
> >  > Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce�s 1880 �Algebra Of Logic� Chapter 3 �
> > Selection 2
> >  >
> >  > Peircers,
> >  >
> >  > Here is the next selection from Peirce's chapter on relatives
> >  > in the 1880 Algebra of Logic, in which he defines the limiting
> >  > concepts of "individuals" and "simples".
> >  >
> >  >
> > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/02/03/peirces-1880-algebra-of-logic-chapter-3-%E2%80%A2-selection-2/
> >  >
> >  > Regards,
> >  >
> >  > Jon
> >  >
> 
> -- 
> 
> academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
> my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
> inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
> isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
> oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
> facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
                                          
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to