Jerry R., List: No doubt the point that you want to make is very clear in your own mind. Unfortunately, it remains quite obscure in your messages, at least as I read them. What exactly do you mean here by "that supposition" or "that rule of 'one two three'"? I already affirm Peirce's categories of Firstness/Secondness/Thirdness--manifested, depending on the context, as chance/law/habit-taking, sign/object/interpretant, icon/index/symbol, term/proposition/argument, feeling/action/thought, possibility/actuality/necessity, abduction/induction/deduction, etc. What additional "truth" are you urging me to accept?
Regards, Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Jerry Rhee <jerryr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jon, > > ha! Thank you for your honest and clear input. I submit that if you were > to accept that supposition (that is, if you adopt that rule of "one two > three" as true), you will find that it will lead you to acceptance of the > truth. That is, if not this, which? Two? > > one, two, three...chance, law, habit-taking. > > Best, > Jerry Rhee >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
