Hello everyone, I follow the discussions somewhat, however, not consistently. Many interesting thoughts and wondering how they would apply in situational case scenarios. So I have a question: How would you apply some of these Peirce "Dynamic/Immediate Object and Determination/Causation" ideas to a concept like "identity"? In particular, personal identity? Thanks in advance. Best wishes, Bev
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jon Alan Schmidt <[email protected] > wrote: > Jeff, List: > > I must confess that I have never found the passage that Gary F. quoted > very helpful in understanding the two Objects and three Interpretants. In > fact, I find myself disagreeing with aspects of Peirce's own analysis, > which worries me very much! For example, how can "disappointment" (Dynamic > Interpretant) *determine *"the sum of the Lessons of the reply, Moral, > Scientific, etc." (Final Interpretant)? > > Thanks, > > Jon >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
