> On Apr 10, 2017, at 12:44 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > How exactly would you pose "the Kantian question about 'Das Ding an sich'? > What makes you think that I am "trying to get a short way out of" it?
I take it primarily as the problem of reference. While Peirce does have the index, he doesn’t require firm ground to use the index. It’s signs all the way down due to the way he conceives of signs. > "Our existing universe" is not limited to the past; it includes the future, > but it obviously does not include any other universes or "Platonic worlds." Not sure what you mean by that.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
