On 9/30/2017 10:54 AM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
Firstness and Secondness [Feeling and Reaction] exist within
the individual and, if the process of forming conclusions is
confined to these two modes - it is indeed a relativist opinion.
It is only within the action of Thirdness that the 'controlled action'
that is a reasoned process can develop.
In any perception, there is always an open-ended range of possible
interpretations. And the interpretations (first, second, or third)
always depend on the experience and nature of the interpreter.
A cat, dog, or human, for example, may enjoy certain kinds of music.
The most advanced kind of enjoyment, by a professional musician,
would depend on "controlled reasoning", but even the professionals
disagree -- and their reasons can span a wide range of options.
For Secondness, a rock will react to a sharp blow in a precisely
controlled manner. But humans may react in complex ways that
depend on their background knowledge and reasoning.
Relativism seems to be a more intellectual process (reasoning)
than an immediate feeling or reaction.
John
PS (cat anecdote): I heard a story about two cats that were
comfortably content while the radio played Bach and Mozart.
But when a dissonant 20th-c. composition came up, they left
the room. Their human also switched the station. Which ones
were feeling, reacting, or reasoning?
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
