Stephen, List: These are outstanding questions, in my view worthy of their own thread. I may offer a few answers after some "chewing" on my own.
Regards, Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Stephen C. Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > These are some issues we might chew on. > > Does Pierce's influence extend beyond the academy? > > Did Peirce see ethics and aesthetics as essential to triadic thinking? Did > he intend his philosophy to have wide influence beyond the scientific > community? > > Are there any public intellectuals who have depended on Peirce. > > In what sense, if any, was Peirce critical of "binary thinking? > > When Peirce compared himself to Aristotle was he looking to have universal > influence? Does he? > > How did Peirce wish his thinking to evolve? Or did he? > > Given the fact that the Brent bio. seems sidely discredited, is a new > biography likely? > > amazon.com/author/stephenrose >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
