List, Francesco: Thank you for your novel post.
It raises to questions. > On Mar 25, 2019, at 2:05 AM, Francesco Bellucci > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Of course, when formalized through FOL that "grammatical" subject will become > a predicate, while the "logical" subject would be a quantified variable 1. I concur with this form of linguistic transformation of the subject term into a predicate term purely for mathematical convenience, but whose FOL are you referring to? And how do you relate this mathematically induced transformative grammatical switch to the logic of a mathematical sentence? 2. Is the assertion that: "Note, in the third place, that in being both ("at one") a Seme and a Pheme, the Sheet of Assertion is both a first and a second.” a weakening of the conceptual distinction between Firstness and Secondness? Cheers Jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
