I was intending to warn Ben against adopting a bullying tone toward you, as his frustration seemed to be mounting. Perhaps a mistake on my part but a response in part to your own complaints about his tone, which you were construing as an attempt to silence you. Also I had been about to answer you with the same point that Ben made and didn't want to feel required to duplicate it.
Joe . ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Marc Orliaguet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Peirce Discussion Forum" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:18 AM Subject: [peirce-l] Re: 1st image of triangle of boxes (MS799.2) Joseph Ransdell wrote: > Ben: > > I don't think you or your position would lose any credibility by > letting Jean-Marc have the last word on the matter. > > Joe Ransdell That's unfair in my opionion. Being accused of not answering, I answer to Ben with counter-arguments and now the question should be shoved under the carpet ... /JM > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Benjamin Udell <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* Peirce Discussion Forum <mailto:[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:14 PM > *Subject:* [peirce-l] Re: 1st image of triangle of boxes (MS799.2) > > Jean-Marc: > > In reading Joe's response to you, I am reminded that you still > haven't taken a stand on the three main trichotomies and their > categorial correlations. If you do in fact understand the > correlations, you may feel that it destroys your argument to admit > that you understand them. But then it comes to the same thing. > > .... --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/368 - Release Date: 6/16/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/368 - Release Date: 6/16/2006 --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [email protected]
