No, but I'm assuming that raghu's New York Times article would have summarised what he said pretty well:
--------------- Late Thursday night, Karl Rove, the architect of the last two Republican presidential victories, was on his new television perch at Fox News, offering free advice to Senator Barack Obama as he closed in on the Democratic nomination. Any move by Mr. Obama to declare victory before the last of the Democratic primaries in June, Mr. Rove said, would alienate Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton's wing of the party. "That's a mistake," he said. "That just is rubbing the loser's nose in it. And a lot of those supporters will remember it by November." ----------------------- this really doesn't look like the sort of thing you could read off any sort of psephological data, now matter how good you were; you'd need to have done a specific poll asking that question and why would Rove have done one of those? Rove's opinion there isn't analysis - it's just normal punditry and doesn't really deserve to be listened to any more than my opinion on television programs I haven't watched. best dd > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Doug Henwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Progressive Economics" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Pen-l] Fox News gets creepier > Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 09:17:34 -0400 > > > > On May 14, 2008, at 8:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > That doesn't really sound much like psephology to me > > Ever watch him on Fox? > > Doug > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
