Ted wrote: > Thus you make the meaning of "fully developed individual" consistent with > "Hindu worship of cows" ignoring Marx's claim that the superstition this > involves is inconsistent with the minimum degree of individual integral > development necessary to initiate a process of transition from capitalism to > communism let alone with the "fully developed individual" with which he > identifies communism itself. > > This is hardly trivial given the outcome of attempting to create "socialism" > in > contexts characterized by significant prejudice and superstition.
I confess that I sinned. May I, however, argue that mixing up the Hindu worship of cows with Marx's fully developed individual is rather venial compared to lacking sense of humor, which should truly send one straight to the fifth ring of Dante's hell? _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
