On 4/15/2013 6:38 PM, Perelman, Michael wrote:

> "After supper he dictated to Boswell an argument in favour of the negro
> who was then claiming his liberty in Scotland.  He hated slavery with a
> zeal which the excellent Boswell thought to be "without knowledge;" and
> on one occasion gave as a toast to some "very grave men" at Oxford,"
> Here's to the next insurrection of negroes in the West Indies."  The
> hatred was combined with as hearty a dislike for American independence.
> "How is it," he said, "that we always hear the loudest yelps for liberty
> amongst the drivers of negroes'?"

====================

Speaking of the ongoing unfreedom -- or is it unliberty -- of 
contemporary supply chains:


<http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/combating-techs-conflict-minerals-with-disclosure/?ref=business>

April 15, 2013, 12:05 am
Combating Tech’s Conflict Minerals With Disclosure
By QUENTIN HARDY

2:49 p.m. | Updated with announcement.Some of our most advanced
technology products have helped finance the deadliest conflicts of our
time. Perhaps, if tech companies change some of their habits, that can
change.

An essential part of most cellphones is the mineral tantalite, which
is frequently obtained from the Democratic Republic of Congo under
murky circumstances. Tin, tungsten and gold also finance armed groups
in Congo on their way to our laptops and tablets.

Hewlett-Packard announced on Monday that it is publishing a list of
195 ore smelters, located around the world, that are identified with
the minerals inside the company’s products. Within about two years,
the company says, it wants its parts suppliers, which buy from these
smelters, to make sure its minerals were not obtained from conflict
zones.

“We believe the upshot of this is, over time, to lower violence and
repression,” said Tony Prophet, who runs the global supply chain for
H.P.’s personal systems group. “The smelters are the chokepoint. Once
you locate them, you can start to pressure them to set a standard.”

While H.P. may be as much as four steps away from the smelters in the
supply chain, Mr. Prophet said, as a major purchaser it can still
compel good behavior.

In August, the Securities and Exchange Commission also adopted a rule
requiring all publicly traded companies to disclose their use of
certain conflict minerals beginning next year, although that rule is
facing a court challenge.

The issue illuminates a chaotic underside to the clean orderliness of
high-tech products. Over the last 15 years, some nine nation’s armies,
and perhaps 15 or more armed groups, have fought in Congo. The body
count for the region’s wars is estimated to be over five million,
making it the world’s deadliest conflict since World War II.

This coincides with the rise in popularity of mobile devices, which
has increased demands for minerals found in Congo. That, in turn,
attracts warlords.

Despite all the killing, supplies have been stable. The minerals, it
turns out, are aggregated through a series of middlemen, much the way
illicit drugs are gathered from small-scale growers.

Teams of miners, sometimes carrying a few bags of rocks on dirt
tracks, deliver the raw goods to négociants, who in turn sell the
material to comptoirs, or trading posts. From there, the goods are
consolidated by an exporter, and then go to smelters in Indonesia,
China, Russia and elsewhere.

When the minerals come out of a region where there is war going on,
there is a good chance that an armed group is being financed. At over
900,000 square miles, or one-quarter the size of all Europe, other
areas of the country are also stable.

Under the new program, “when the smelters source from the region, they
will need to have documents showing the sources of the minerals,” said
Jay Celorie, H.P.’s program manager for the conflict minerals project.
“If we limit the number of aggregators, we can start to source
responsibly, from the country’s pockets of stability.”

If almost no one buys from conflict regions, the theory runs, that
creates incentives for peace, or at least some stability, to break
out.

The smelters documentation will be audited by H.P., in conjunction
with Solutions for Hope, a nongovernmental organization trying to end
the trade in conflict minerals.

The move follows earlier efforts by H.P. to shine a light on its
manufacturing. H.P. has publicly identified its top 100 parts
suppliers, both by name and address, and created a supplier
self-assessment around things like labor practices.

It is an imperfect system. Last year, The New York Times reported on
labor violations in China by Foxconn, a Taiwanese company that makes
products for H.P., Dell and Apple, among others. In February, H.P.
imposed rules limiting student labor by its contractors.

Mr. Prophet said H.P. would seek to enlist other companies, many of
which already have some affiliation with nongovernmental
organizations, to join the smelter program.

“Outreach is the only way to really make a difference,” Mr. Prophet
said. “It took awhile to identify all of the smelters, but putting
pressure on them is relatively easy.”



_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to