"Opposites" are treacherous, too. Sometimes even more so. The opposite of
the proverbial lump-of-labor fallacy ("the theory of compensation as
regards the workpeople displaced by machinery") is *also* a fallacy and, in
fact, is the more pernicious fallacy because there are people (economists)
who actually, fervently believe in it.On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Julio Huato <[email protected]> wrote: > > True in principle. But how many of us here believe that the best way > to elicit social progress on environmental matters is by becoming more > individually wasteful or polluting? > > -- Cheers, Tom Walker (Sandwichman)
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
