On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Louis Proyect <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/25/14 11:25 PM, Shemano, David B. wrote: > > Why do you think his move from profit to non-profit is a good thing, > > will result in any improvement in patient care, will result in reduced > > cost, etc.? > > > > Although I have Raghu blocked and generally don't pay attention to > libertarians (a disorder I outgrew in 1961), the two men touch upon a > point that is interesting. > What a pompous ass. Here's a drinking game for Thanksgiving: every time Louis Proyect proudly announces that he has "blocked" me, you take a shot. For someone who has supposedly "blocked" me, this guy sure as hell seems to follow what I write rather closely. The rest of his message is a non-sequitor. In the quoted passage, I obviously used "for-profit" and "not-for-profit" as ideal types. In the real-world there are no ideal types and you can always find lots of corner cases. What is so profound about this observation? Idiot. -raghu.
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
