On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Eubulides <[email protected]> wrote:
I'd assert, welcoming further clarification from you, that the > public/private distinction you're invoking is not consistent with the > way vast numbers of the legal profession in the USA view that particular > legislative/juridical construct. It's incoherence is a significant > opportunity for leftists across a large number of public policy domains. > But that would entail studying lots of law review journals. I'm afraid I don't know what you mean. By "health care in the public domain," I envision something like the Veterans Health Administration, New York City's Health and Hospitals Corporation, or public university hospitals, but national in scope and providing free care to all on demand. That's what I *favor*, as opposed to a voucher system for the private sector. But as I said, I'm not sure what incoherence you mean (and I'm certainly capable of some, no doubt about that). Maybe rephrase it? -- "Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað."
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
