o-----------ooO--(- Important  Message -)--Ooo------------o
|                                                         |
| SAVE BANDWITH, SPACE, TIME & MONEY, REPLY WITH PRUDENCE.|
|                                                         |
o----=[ Penguin @ My - Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ]=----o


> > > Which 68 pin cable are you talking about? LVD or just plain old >68pin
> >Ultra Wide Single Ended?
> >
> >i've got no idea regarding this. but what i found from adaptec website..,
> >the above scsi card that i'm using currently are Ultra Wide SCSI.
> >So 'agak-agak'.., i'm using the 68pin Ultra Wide Single Ended..?
> >
> Ok, what brand and model is your harddrive? With that, I could probably
find
> out if it's SE or LVD.

-- brand seagate model ST318275LW
    perhaps this can help

>
> >Do i have to use the external termination (active)..?  Coz from what > i
> >'agak-agak'.., i'm now using the passive termination cable. But > i'm in
> >doubt for the both termination type. What's make my server performance
> >better if i'm using the active termination instead the passive one..?
Could
> >u please give me the rough idea about it. > thanks.
> Ok. If your cable has a fixed non removable terminator, it's "usually"
> active termination. However, if it isn't you're pretty much stuck with it.
> If you want to use active termination, you will have to buy a new cable
and
> buy and active terminator for it. A 5 devices 68pin SE cable with Active
> termination costs around US$70 here. Note that I'm talking about good
ones,
> not some cheap cable from someone's backyard :) As far as I've seen, SE
> cables usually don't come with termination on it. You're probably using an
> LVD cable. Like I said earlier, LVD comes with active termination unless
the
> manufacturer cut costs and put passive on it. In this case, the
> cable+terminator combo would come to US$100. I'm not sure of the prices in
> Malaysia though, check Imbi/Subang Parade/Sunway. I would think Imbi would
> have a wider choice since SCSI is basically a luxury back home.
Performance
> wise, if there's only 1 HDD and the cable is short, passive and active
won't
> make a difference. If there's heavy traffic (database/HDD seek) then
passive
> tend to cause more errors, but SCSI is designed to work around the errors
> (with lower speeds). I'm thinking you should be pretty safe. Is there away
> you could provide me with the model number of the controller chip on your
> controller? It should either AIC-xxxx or AHA-xxxx. Thanks.
>

-- The chip was covered by other labeled. So i can see it. Hehe.., afraid to
tear the label coz.., the warranty may avoid. Maybe this can help you..,
AHA-294UW PRO 1800000 A 9928 (this number was printed on the labeled).

regards

-- Gong Xi Fa Chai

>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "ifad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Reply-To: "Penguin @ My-Linux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >To: "Abdul Rahman Johari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,        "raden
> >keontjoro
> > > >hadiningrat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,        "Penguin @ My-Linux"
> > > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Subject: [Penguin] AHA-2940UW PRO
> > > >Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 14:37:33 +0800
> > > >MIME-Version: 1.0
> > > >Received: from [202.188.177.125] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
> > > >MHotMailBA615B9100B9D820F3BACABCB17D045F0; Wed Feb 02 03:10:16 2000
> > > >Received: (from majordom@localhost)by My.Enemy.ORG (8.9.3/8.9.0) id
> > > >QAA24708for penguin-list; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 16:16:35 +0800
> > > >Received: (from moderate@localhost)by My.Enemy.ORG (8.9.3/8.9.0) id
> > > >QAA24376for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 16:15:56 +0800
> > > >Received: from mimos.my (mimos.my [192.228.128.18])by My.Enemy.ORG
> > > >(8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA14495for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,
2
> >Feb
> > > >2000 14:37:43 +0800
> > > >Received: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 14:37:43 +0800
> > > >Received: from nonama.mimos.my (fadhil.mimos.my [192.228.132.70])by
> > > >mimos.my (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA20087;Wed, 2 Feb 2000 14:36:37
> >+0800
> > > >(MYT)
> > > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 02 03:10:23 2000
> > > >X-Authentication-Warning: My.Enemy.ORG: majordom set sender to
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
> > > >Posted-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 14:37:43 +0800
> > > >Message-ID: <011c01bf6d47$fd7b8720$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > ><004801bf6700$ca8c0c60$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >X-Priority: 3
> > > >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.203
> > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.203
> > > >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Precedence: bulk
> > > >
> > > >o-----------ooO--(- Important  Message -)--Ooo------------o
> > > >|                                                         |
> > > >| SAVE BANDWITH, SPACE, TIME & MONEY, REPLY WITH PRUDENCE.|
> > > >|                                                         |
> > > >o----=[ Penguin @ My - Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ]=----o
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >HeHe..,
> > > >Nampak gayanya.., prob aku dah selesai.
> > > >Pasal itu h/d baru dari seagate.., dia dah tak pakai itu internal
> > > >termination. Jadi terpaksalah aku meng "terminate" sundri-sundri itu
> >cable
> > > >scsi h/d.
> > > >Tapi masalahnya sekarang.., itu termination cable yang aku pakai
> >sekarang
> > > >nie.., samada active atau passive. Ada ker yang passive dan yang
active
> >utk
> > > >scsi cable 68-pin tu..?
> > > >
> > > >Walaumacammanasekalipun.., jasa baik kalian yang telah memberi
sedikit
> > > >sebanyak idea pada aku nie.., aku ucapkan terima kasih.
> > > >
> > > >-- Selamat Hari Raya
> > > >-
> > > >Disclaimer : http://users.my-linux.org/disclaimer.html
> > > >
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________
> > > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> > > -
> > > Disclaimer : http://users.my-linux.org/disclaimer.html
> > >
> > >
> >-
> >Disclaimer : http://users.my-linux.org/disclaimer.html
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> -
> Disclaimer : http://users.my-linux.org/disclaimer.html
>
>
-
Disclaimer : http://users.my-linux.org/disclaimer.html

Reply via email to