Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads

[Dan Sugalski]

At 09:01 AM 5/4/2001 -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>On Fri, 4 May 2001, Artur Bergman wrote:
>
> > Then this is a bug in bleadperls implmentation of :shared GVs?
>
>i don't consider it a bug.  data that might be "upgraded" at runtime
>should never have been marked as shared in the first place.

We probably ought to nudge the code that sets the shared bits to 
pre-upgrade, then. This is a good spot for really subtle and hard to track 
down bugs.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk