Doug Maceachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Fri, 4 May 2001, Artur Bergman wrote:
>
>> Then this is a bug in bleadperls implmentation of :shared GVs?
>
>i don't consider it a bug. data that might be "upgraded" at runtime
>should never have been marked as shared in the first place.
But it is all too easy to upgrade:
my $limit : shared = 10;
...
if ($count > $limit)
{
warn "$count is above $limit"; # **** UPGRADE ****
}
--
Nick Ing-Simmons
who is looking for a new job see http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads nick
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Nicholas Clark
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- RE: our :shared $foo / iThreads Horsley Tom
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
