On Fri, 4 May 2001, Artur Bergman wrote: > But large hashes contains SVs, are they also shared READONLY? no, just the hash is marked readonly. > Can't they be stringified or upgraded in anyway? 'can', sure. 'should', no. i'll say it again: data that might be modified at runtime should never have been marked as shared in the first place.
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads nick
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Nicholas Clark
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- RE: our :shared $foo / iThreads Horsley Tom
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
