Paul Rogers [CE] wrote:
> Philip Newton wrote:
> > So having Visual Perl is orthogonal to having Visual C++;
> > you can have one without the other. As I understand it, at
> > least.
>
> So Visual Perl will not require having Visual Studio? This
> doesn't seem right.
[snip]
>From the Visual Perl page on ActiveState:
"Visual Perl is a plug in for Microsoft's next-generation development
environment, Visual Studio 7."
...
"Visual Perl will be available at the same time as Visual Studio 7."
I read this as saying that Visual Perl (and Visual Python) are NOT
standalone, but require Visual Studio 7.
Thanks,
Garold (Gary) L. Johnson
DYNAMIC Alternatives
---
You are currently subscribed to perl-win32-users as: [archive@jab.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For non-automated Mailing List support, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
