At 05:44 PM 8/10/00 +0100, Graham Barr wrote: >Well what is the difference between try and eval ? There isn't any. I could have sworn I once read that the block eval was so different from the string eval that Larry wanted to use 'try', but didn't want to add another keyword, but later wished he had. I couldn't find this, and the current docs give no hint of remorse, so it could all be a scurrilous figment of my imagination. It appears that the majority favors eval, though... -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and clas... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... John Porter
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... John Porter
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for buil... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for builtins Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for buil... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes ... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and clas... John Porter