Chaim Frenkel wrote: > > Let the object determine the calling convention for the method. > I see very little reason to have two methods with different signatures. Yes! That's the Perl philosophy! Right on! -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for buil... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and clas... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... John Porter
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... John Porter
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and... Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for buil... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for builtins Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for buil... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes ... Jeremy Howard
