Re: RFC 80 (v1): Exception objects and classes for builtins

[Chaim Frenkel]

>>>>> "PC" == Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

PC> The (continue|always|finally|whatever) clause will *always* be
PC> executed, even if one of the catch clauses does a die, so you can use
PC> this to roll back the database transaction or whatever else was going
PC> on and restore any invariants.

Err, how does one differentiate between a 'good' entry and a 'bad' entry.

PC> Note too that we don't need to do any case based magic, we can and
PC> should use polymorphism for that.

Why? Just because?

<chaim>
-- 
Chaim Frenkel                                        Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                               +1-718-236-0183