Darren Duncan wrote: > Putting aside legacy issues for the moment, > > I suggest that it might be appropriate to rename the .grep list operator > to .where, so we can say, for example: > > @filtered = @originals.where:{ .foo eq $bar }; > > We already have a "where" keyword in the language, which is used for > very similar things, and I think it would be reasonable that users would > see it used in other situations and think they can use it for filtering > a list too.
I agree with this proposal, although I don't full understand the implications of using "where" in this context when it already appears elsewhere in the language. Mark